Head to head
Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP vs StackShield
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Google Workspace security auditing — login audit, external sharing, daily brief
Full listingNo reviews yet
External security monitoring for Laravel apps: list domains, trigger scans, read issues and fixes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP (92/100 against 70). StackShield is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP runs on your own machine. Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP | StackShield | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 78 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP vs SaaS AlertsGoogle Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP vs npm Registry MCP ServerGoogle Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP vs grim-mcpGoogle Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP vs Security Intel MCPGoogle Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCP vs Flutter StructureAll Security servers