Mmcp.market

Head to head

Reversecore MCP vs Rune

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Reversecore MCPio.github.sjkim1127/reversecore-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.

Full listing
Runeio.github.thecolourfoundation/rune
A
No reviews yet

Evidence-traced codebase understanding and security scanning for AI agents over MCP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Rune (89/100 against 77). Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 Reversecore MCPRune
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A89/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2038
Downloads / week128–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools4410
Write actions4—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-20
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Reversecore MCP vs CrowdStrike Falcon MCP ServerReversecore MCP vs CodeInspectusReversecore MCP vs MCPProxyReversecore MCP vs Npm SentinelReversecore MCP vs npm Registry MCP ServerAll Security servers