Head to head
squirrelscan vs SyteCheck
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Website QA for your coding agent: audit SEO, performance, security, accessibility over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Scan a website for SEO, accessibility, performance and security issues, and read the report.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (76 and 78 out of 100). squirrelscan is hosted and callable through the gateway; SyteCheck runs on your own machine. squirrelscan has noticeably more public adoption.
| squirrelscan | SyteCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 267 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 66 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 25 | 6 |
| Write actions | 6 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |