Mmcp.market

Head to head

Tokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Cost vs ctxlint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Tokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Costio.github.sriinnu/tokmeter
A
No reviews yet

Tokens and cost for Claude Code, Codex and 14 more AI coding agents, from local session files.

Full listing
ctxlintio.github.YawLabs/ctxlint
A
No reviews yet

Lint AI agent context files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.) against your actual codebase

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 91 out of 100). ctxlint has noticeably more public adoption.

 Tokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Costctxlint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A91/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars09
Downloads / week347.9k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools24—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Tokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Cost vs llmtrimTokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Cost vs Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude CodeTokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Cost vs mcptoonTokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Cost vs OrcareplayTokmeter — AI Agent Usage & Cost vs Total Agent MemoryAll AI and agents servers