Mmcp.market

Head to head

CodeInspectus vs Raziel

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

CodeInspectusio.github.Synvoya/codeinspectus
C
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.

Full listing
Razielio.github.tide-foundation/raziel
B
No reviews yet

MCP server teaching AI agents to implement TideCloak: auth, E2EE, IGA, security analysis

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Raziel (81/100 against 58). Raziel is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine. CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.

 CodeInspectusRaziel
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC58/100B81/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars470
Downloads / week10160
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools720
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0NOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-072026-08-20
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

CodeInspectus vs Reversecore MCPCodeInspectus vs MCPProxyCodeInspectus vs GuardvibeCodeInspectus vs SecHelixCodeInspectus vs Firefly IiiAll Security servers