Head to head
Tenjin vs xdataapi: X (Twitter) data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search, read & publish paid essays. Pay-per-read in USDC on Base (x402); wallet-only, no account.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read-only public X (Twitter) data: profiles, tweets, threads, followers, search. Pay per result.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours xdataapi: X (Twitter) data (95/100 against 75). Tenjin has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tenjin | xdataapi: X (Twitter) data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 7 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 63 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 23 | — |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |