Head to head
Scope Change vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scope changes against a work order, each with a reason, a date and the client's approval on record.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Typed record store + hybrid search over MCP: deterministic lookups + semantic memory, per-customer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (82/100 against 73). MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Scope Change | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 299 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 23 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |