Head to head
Codna — repository intelligence vs Whalesync
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Map a repo before spending a token: triage, bug-fix PRs, SARIF reachability, on-device recall.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Build and manage Whalesync syncs: connect apps, map tables and fields, monitor and fix issues.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Whalesync (100/100 against 82). Whalesync is hosted and callable through the gateway; Codna — repository intelligence runs on your own machine.
| Codna — repository intelligence | Whalesync | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |