Head to head
upkeep-mcp vs Traffalyzer
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
upkeep-mcp
Aio.github.tiagocalado86/upkeep-mcpNo reviews yet
Website maintenance checks: domains, SSL, uptime, technical SEO and accessibility
Full listing
No reviews yet
SEO & UX audits for your websites: findings, Search Console data, growth plan and site scans.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upkeep-mcp (92/100 against 70). Traffalyzer is hosted and callable through the gateway; upkeep-mcp runs on your own machine. upkeep-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| upkeep-mcp | Traffalyzer | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 89 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |