Mmcp.market

Head to head

arcstone-mcp-sidecar vs Trooth

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

arcstone-mcp-sidecario.github.trencinodin-stack/arcstone-mcp-sidecar
C
No reviews yet

Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack

Full listing
Troothio.github.trooth-eng/trooth-network
A
No reviews yet

Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trooth (85/100 against 65). Trooth is hosted and callable through the gateway; arcstone-mcp-sidecar runs on your own machine.

 arcstone-mcp-sidecarTrooth
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100A85/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—4
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

arcstone-mcp-sidecar vs MCPProxyarcstone-mcp-sidecar vs dns-doctorarcstone-mcp-sidecar vs spintax.net MCP serverarcstone-mcp-sidecar vs npm Registry MCP Serverarcstone-mcp-sidecar vs Reversecore MCPAll Security servers