Head to head
Gro vs Email
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Query SES send history, delivery events, domains and suppressions, and send from your AWS account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Email (89/100 against 60). Gro is hosted and callable through the gateway; Email runs on your own machine. Email has noticeably more public adoption.
| Gro | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 264 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 8 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category |