Head to head
Pullzip vs Video Extract
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pullzip
Bio.github.work517/archiveflowNo reviews yet
Inspect, search and safely extract zip/7z/rar/tar archives; repair garbled CJK file names.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Download any video from a URL, or get its transcript and key frames. All local, no API keys.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Video Extract (91/100 against 83). Video Extract has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pullzip | Video Extract | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 356 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |