Is Arcade1v1 MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/index.js: …ode, sch); const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.de…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Arcade1v1 does
- PDFAgentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.not reviewedEstablishedA
- CHAP CoordinatorAuditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Async Parallel Antigravity for Codex & Claude CodeRun parallel, resumable, human-operable Antigravity CLI sessions from any MCP agent harnessnot reviewedGrowingA
