Is Neon Zero-Trust MCP Gateway MCP server safe?
Not recommended.
Hidden from default browsing. Significant findings or unreachable.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 10284ms; handshake note: MCP handshake timed out after 10000ms12/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Overall 45/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Safer options for the same job
- MCPProxyLocal-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savingsnot reviewedGrowingB
- ssh-mcpMCP gateway for controlled SSH access with per-client auth, command policies, and audit logging.not reviewedGrowingB
- TrustScanSecurity scanner for MCP servers and skills: Unicode injection, patterns, secrets.not reviewedNewC