Is Memory Arbiter MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- Code scan64 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 92/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Memory Arbiter does
- RememLocal-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.not reviewedEstablishedB
skillmemSkill memory for coding agents: learn, recall, reinforce, decay. Local SQLite, no API key.not reviewedGrowingA- TetherLocal-first agent memory over SQLite: remember, recall, link, forget. Degrades, never fails.not reviewedGrowingB
