Is Readme Canary MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1861ms; handshake note: [ { "code": "invalid_union", "errors": [ [ { "code": "invalid_value", "value20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancelast push 35 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Readme Canary does
- PentestOffline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.not reviewedGrowingB
- MobiLoopGuarded AI mobile Appium testing, security scanning, verification, and fix-retest MCP tools.not reviewedGrowingA
- Bee by HEOSSIBee by HEOSSI: governed multimodal intelligence - chat, code, security, research, documents, memory.not reviewedNewB
