Mmcp.market

Is Hypermnesia Viz MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan305 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true
    hypermnesia_mcp_viz-3.2.0/cortex_viz/infrastructure/mcp_client_spawn.py: …list. Args are passed as a list (no shell=True). The environment is merged from os.env…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Hypermnesia Viz does

  • Codebase Memory
    Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
    C
  • Deja Vu
    deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.
    A
  • Trace
    Code graph MCP: 81 languages, 88 frameworks, 72.7% fewer PR-review tokens, comprehension at parity
    A

Hypermnesia Viz reviews, tools and install