Is Nautilus Compass Memory MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.8 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan132 source files scanned20/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 766ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalnautilus_compass-3.2.0/daemon.py: … # 砍激活 buffer(可 env 覆盖)。释放显存给共置的 gate B eval(soul 收敛路径)。 try: _max_seq = …
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Nautilus Compass Memory does
MemorixLocal-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.not reviewedEstablishedB- PlurOpen, local-first engram memory for AI agents: read, correct, delete; shared over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA
- VestigeLocal-first memory for AI agents that reaches backward to find a failure's root cause.not reviewedEstablishedB
