Is CodeNib MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan580 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; GitHub account older than a year; website matches verified namespace8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truecodenib-0.2.3/codenib/agent/tools/defaults.py: …design command, shell=True, cwd=cwd, stdin…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalcodenib-0.2.3/codenib/index/rerank/cross_encoder.py: … self._model = self._model.to(device).eval() # Pre-resolve yes/no token id…
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what CodeNib does
Bitbybit CAD MCPBitbybit 3D parametric CAD API, version-exact, for coding agents: search, describe, examples, guidenot reviewedEstablishedA- MisakanetFailure-memory layer for coding agents: search evidence-rated failure lessons by error text.not reviewedEstablishedA
- HIG DoctorApple Human Interface Guidelines search, lookup, and project audits for AI coding agents.not reviewedEstablishedB
