Is Familiar MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; GitHub account older than a year; website matches verified namespace7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/mcp-package/index.mjs: …&&(d=this.opts.code.process(d,e));let f=new Function(`${xo.default.self}`,`${xo.default.scope…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Familiar does
- FishMCP server exposing the AceDataCloud Fish Audio API (text-to-speech with voice conditioning)not reviewedGrowingA
Tegas AIAI video production for marketing and social media: script, scenes, voice-over, subtitles, music.not reviewedGrowingA- NotebookLM MCPAutomate Google NotebookLM — Q&A with citations, audio, video, content generationnot reviewedEstablishedC