Is Feedback1 MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 579ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: unknown3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Feedback1 does
- COTAL actions (cotal.ai)cotal.ai actions: product overview, site search, build log, feedback, Cloud waitlist, updates, callsnot reviewedEstablishedB
SquadDecision intelligence for product teams. Turn scattered feedback into signal you can act on.not reviewedGrowingA- Loki ModeAutonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 36 tools over stdio.not reviewedEstablishedB