Mmcp.market

Is RE-call MCP Memory Server MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B80/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.7 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scansource not scanned: tarball over 25MB25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what RE-call MCP Memory Server does

  • Echo Memory
    Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.
    A
  • Memory Vault
    Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.
    B
  • Engraphy
    Self-hosted MCP memory server: a typed knowledge graph on Postgres 16 and pgvector.
    B

RE-call MCP Memory Server reviews, tools and install