Mmcp.market

Is GitJog — Hungarian legislation MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A91/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1053ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning6 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
  • Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 91/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what GitJog — Hungarian legislation does

  • Wikipedia
    Search Wikipedia, read summaries and full text, target sections, find nearby pages, list languages.
    More from cyanheads →
    A
  • tc39-mcp
    Independent MCP server for the TC39 specs (ECMA-262 + ECMA-402): clauses, search, diffs, history.
    A
  • jDocmunch MCP
    Section-level doc search for .md, .rst, .adoc, .ipynb, .html, .yaml, .json, and OpenAPI specs.
    A

GitJog — Hungarian legislation reviews, tools and install