Mmcp.market

Is Seatbelt MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A88/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan94 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 51 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Seatbelt does

  • Protect
    Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
    C
  • llmtrim
    MCP server and proxy that compresses LLM prompts, tool output, and replies to cut token cost.
    A
  • Ausca
    Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
    B

Seatbelt reviews, tools and install