Is Eth Library MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan19 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueeth_library_mcp-0.4.0/audits/2026-05-28T142641-Z-eth-library-mcp/verification-results.json: … "No os.system, no subprocess, no shell=True, no eval(), no exec() anywhere in src/ …
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaleth_library_mcp-0.4.0/audits/2026-05-28T142641-Z-eth-library-mcp/verification-results.json: …ystem, no subprocess, no shell=True, no eval(), no exec() anywhere in src/ (grep retu…
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON