Is Claude Prompts MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan98 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalresources/gates/pr-security/gate.yaml: …idance forbidden_patterns: - 'eval(' - 'innerHTML =' - 'dangero…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Claude Prompts does
- ImageAI image generation and editing with prompt optimization and quality presetsnot reviewedEstablishedB
- Agent-Native AnalyticsAgent-Native Amplitude/Mixpanel - connect data sources, prompt for chartsnot reviewedEstablishedA
- llmtrimMCP server and proxy that compresses LLM prompts, tool output, and replies to cut token cost.not reviewedEstablishedA
