Is Neon MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 152ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; GitHub account older than a year; website matches verified namespace8/10
Overall 97/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Neon does
- PostgreSQLMCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.not reviewedEstablishedB
- RebaseSchema, database, document, user and dev-server tools for a Rebase backend project.not reviewedGrowingB
- DBHubToken-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLitenot reviewedWidely usedA