Is Neurarch MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan4 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/index.js: … ${className}() `; code += ` model.eval() `; if (hasMultipleInputs) { con…
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Neurarch does
ActuatorHire vetted local people for real-world jobs: post, rank, hire, pay in escrow, verify with photos.not reviewedNewB
Scholar FeedRank CS/AI/ML papers by citations, forecast impact, or code adoption; trace 23.2M citation edges.not reviewedEstablishedB- Log10x MCPTools to rank log patterns by volume and cost and to compact, tier down or offload each patternnot reviewedGrowingA
