Mmcp.market

Is Wikipedia Retrieval MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B70/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 low
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1649ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
  • Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
  • Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10

Findings (1)

  • lowNo source repository listedmaint.no-repo
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Wikipedia Retrieval MCP does

  • M3 Memory
    Local-first memory — 100+ tools, 99.2% LongMemEval-S retrieval@10, hybrid search, GDPR, no cloud.
    A
  • Silica Core
    Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
    A
  • Wikipedia
    Search Wikipedia, read summaries and full text, target sections, find nearby pages, list languages.
    A

Wikipedia Retrieval MCP reviews, tools and install