Is FireKey MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.7 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- Code scan17 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 55/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what FireKey MCP does
Public BrowserBrowse your real profile: -30% tokens, -25% cost, -41% tool calls, -34% tool defs, +40% fasternot reviewedGrowingA- SeleniumBase MCPStealthy browser automation, testing, and web-scraping via CDP Mode.not reviewedWidely usedA
- AIHawkAI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.not reviewedWidely usedA