Is TerraVision MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan184 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

terravision-0.47.0/modules/resource_handlers_azure.py: … zone = str(eval(zone)) excep…

Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Cloud FinOps Skill & MCP
Cloud cost + FinOps knowledge for AI agents: AWS/Azure/GCP optimisation, AI spend, waste playbooks.
not reviewed
Established
B
Cloudeval AI
Cloud evaluations and reviews for Azure and static AWS CloudFormation (beta). Requires an account.
not reviewed
Growing
B
ZopDev MCP
Cloud cost, inventory and governance on AWS/Azure/GCP. Read-only by default, optional scoped writes
not reviewed
Growing
A