Mmcp.market

Is Gate402 MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Gate402 does

  • Ausca
    Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
    B
  • Maginary
    AI image + video generation for agents: --flag prompt DSL, async generate/poll, x402 pay-per-use.
    B
  • BridgeNode MCP
    BridgeNode — x402 pay-per-request AI inference. OpenAI-compatible API + MCP, Solana USDC, gas-free.
    A

Gate402 reviews, tools and install