Is Inferbench MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan23 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 5 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueinferbench_cli-0.1.7/src/inferbench/harness/spawn_server.py: …rocess.Popen with no shell involved (no shell=True anywhere in this module or its callers)…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Inferbench does
- mcptoonMCP tools + agent skills in one zero-dependency CLI: 71,929 -> 581 tokens (-99.2%, measured).not reviewedEstablishedA
- llmtrimMCP server and proxy that compresses LLM prompts, tool output, and replies to cut token cost.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Agent LspOrchestrates language servers into 65 code-intelligence tools across 31 languages, token-optimized.not reviewedEstablishedA