Is Redaction MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 425ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (bearer)9/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Overall 60/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Redaction does
- MCPAuthorize consequential AI agent actions before executionnot reviewedEstablishedA
- ProjectmemCoding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.not reviewedGrowingA
- DataSinkingFull-text Asian financial reports (China, Korea, Japan) as clean Markdown — 6 tools for RAG agents.not reviewedGrowingA