Is SMRITI Memory MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan23 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 19 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ4/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truesmriti_memcore-1.4.17/smriti_memcore/integrations/install.py: …| bash" subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, check=True) except Exception a…
Overall 78/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what SMRITI Memory does
- Nautilus Compass MemoryLocal-first long-term memory for AI agents, with byte-recomputable signed verification receipts.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
State Memory MCPDeterministic, persistent graph server for tracking workflow state, decisions, and blockers.not reviewedEstablishedA