Mmcp.market

Is Mi Fitness Data Bridge MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B70/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityno auth information5/15
  • Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Mi Fitness Data Bridge does

  • Remem
    Local-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.
    B
  • remem-mcp — Local-first MCP Memory + CodeGraph + Wiki
    Local-first memory for AI coding agents. Memory + CodeGraph + Wiki in one SQLite file.
    B
  • Lific
    Local-first, lightweight issue tracker. Single binary, SQLite-backed, MCP-native.
    A

Mi Fitness Data Bridge reviews, tools and install