Is Monet MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan4 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/cli.js: …&&(l=this.opts.code.process(l,t));let m=new Function(`${Qn.default.self}`,`${Qn.default.scope…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Monet does
- Prism CoderSession memory for coding agents: local-first recall, drift detection, on-device inference.not reviewedEstablishedC
MemorixLocal-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.not reviewedEstablishedB- CitraLocal-first PDF evidence for agents: structure, tables, OCR, and citations. SDK · CLI · MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA