Is trovex MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan46 source files scanned; 34 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 17 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaltrovex-0.15.0/src/trovex/cli.py: ….Option("gpt-5.4-mini", help="LLM for --eval (answers + judges)."), json_out: bool… - mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaltrovex-0.13.1/src/trovex/cli.py: ….Option("gpt-5.4-mini", help="LLM for --eval (answers + judges)."), json_out: bool…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what trovex does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
TraceCode graph MCP: 81 languages, 88 frameworks, 72.7% fewer PR-review tokens, comprehension at paritynot reviewedEstablishedA