Is PostgreSQL MCP Server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan3 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/index.js: …ourceCode, sch); const validate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.de…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what PostgreSQL MCP Server does
- PostgreSQLMCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Postgres AIopsGoverned PostgreSQL DBA ops: slow-query RCA, bloat/vacuum & blocking-lock analysis; 35 MCP tools.not reviewedGrowingA
- not reviewedNewA
