Is Fairsign MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1877ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 67/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Fairsign does
- Nutrient DWS MCP ServerNutrient Processor + Data Extraction MCP: convert, OCR, sign, redact, and extract PDFs/Office docs.not reviewedGrowingA
UindowReal signed-browser automation for AI agents, over a local stdio MCP server.not reviewedGrowingA
GhostlightVisible local browser automation in signed-in Chromium, with optional policy and audit.not reviewedGrowingA