Head to head
Google Tasks MCP vs gflow-cli
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for the Google Tasks API: task lists, subtasks, due dates, complete and move tasks.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours gflow-cli (92/100 against 82).
| Google Tasks MCP | gflow-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 216 |
| Downloads / week | 36 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 16 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |