Head to head
Google Tasks MCP vs Context7
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for the Google Tasks API: task lists, subtasks, due dates, complete and move tasks.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Context7 (90/100 against 82). Context7 is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Tasks MCP runs on your own machine. Context7 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Google Tasks MCP | Context7 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 62k |
| Downloads / week | 36 | 618k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |