Head to head
Gateway vs Ghostfox
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Durable self for AI agents: one-call resume, memory, real browser, free chat + hire real humans.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Self-hosted stealth browser for AI agents: Firefox engine + Rust MCP runtime
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Gateway (77/100 against 65). Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; Ghostfox runs on your own machine.
| Gateway | Ghostfox | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 57 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |