Head to head
Contextforge vs Graphql Enhanced
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
GraphQL gateway for LLMs. Handles huge GitHub GraphQL & @neo4j/graphql schemas without crashing
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Graphql Enhanced (92/100 against 83).
| Contextforge | Graphql Enhanced | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 59 | 9.5k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 69 | — |
| Write actions | 25 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |