Mmcp.market

Head to head

Superagenticmcp vs Agent-Native Plan

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Superagenticmcpio.github.ANAMIZED/superagenticmcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP-native router and multi-agent control plane: plan, route tool calls, stream execution.

Full listing
Agent-Native Planio.github.BuilderIO/agent-native-plan
A
No reviews yet

Structured visual plans and PR recaps with diagrams, prototypes, annotations, and sharing

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Plan (98/100 against 70). Agent-Native Plan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Superagenticmcp runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Plan has noticeably more public adoption.

 SuperagenticmcpAgent-Native Plan
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB70/100A98/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars14.9k
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0—
Last release2026-08-272026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Superagenticmcp vs three.ws BrainSuperagenticmcp vs agent-deviceSuperagenticmcp vs MCPSuperagenticmcp vs Ts CoreSuperagenticmcp vs Godot MCPAll AI and agents servers