Mmcp.market

Head to head

Superagenticmcp vs agent-device

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Superagenticmcpio.github.ANAMIZED/superagenticmcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP-native router and multi-agent control plane: plan, route tool calls, stream execution.

Full listing
agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agent-device (94/100 against 70). agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 Superagenticmcpagent-device
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB70/100A94/100
AdoptionNewWidely used
GitHub stars14.7k
Downloads / week–118k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-08-272026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Superagenticmcp vs Agent-Native PlanSuperagenticmcp vs three.ws BrainSuperagenticmcp vs MCPSuperagenticmcp vs Ts CoreSuperagenticmcp vs Godot MCPAll AI and agents servers