Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs MCPProxy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (75 and 73 out of 100). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCPProxy runs on your own machine. MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | MCPProxy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 376 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs dns-doctorMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs spintax.net MCP serverMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs npm Registry MCP ServerMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Reversecore MCPMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs mcp-debeziumAll Security servers