Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs npm Registry MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditorio.github.Ansarii/mcp-security-auditor
B
No reviews yet

Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.

Full listing
npm Registry MCP Serverio.github.YawLabs/npmjs-mcp
B
No reviews yet

npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours npm Registry MCP Server (83/100 against 75). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor is hosted and callable through the gateway; npm Registry MCP Server runs on your own machine. npm Registry MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditornpm Registry MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB75/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars02
Downloads / week–1.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—64
Write actions—10
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-14
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security PreflightMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs grim-mcpMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security Txt Cra LintMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs DraugrMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs ScanLabsAI Security ScannerAll Security servers