Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs CodeInspectus

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditorio.github.Ansarii/mcp-security-auditor
B
No reviews yet

Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.

Full listing
CodeInspectusio.github.Synvoya/codeinspectus
C
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor (75/100 against 58). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine. CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.

 MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorCodeInspectus
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB75/100C58/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars047
Downloads / week–101
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—7
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-07
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security PreflightMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs TrustScanMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs grim-mcpMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security Txt Cra LintMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs DraugrAll Security servers