Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQLio.github.antonorlov/mcp-postgres-server
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.

Full listing
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL (83/100 against 68).

 PostgreSQLPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C68/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars223
Downloads / week2.9k91
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools6—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-162026-09-20
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL vs NeonPostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL vs Postgres AIopsPostgreSQL vs DB AccessPostgreSQL vs health4aiAll Databases servers